The Brief History of Russian “Collusion” Hoax

They say that the higher the hubris is, the harder it falls. A well known Proverb verse, based loosely on Davidic testimony (Proverbs 16:18), reminds us that “pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” Such intimate details can be said to describe the time prior to 2016 election as well as the haughty aftermath.

This is not a mock-memoir. Nor is it in any way intended an honorable memorabilia to the late Robert Mueller. It is quite opposite. In a way, his persecution of innocents is a sure sign of his fall from grace and the failure to secure reputation of intelligence agencies at large. His job as a special counsel was a fool’s errand sent to assure that Government matters and that it is not infallible to “outside” influences. In addition, this collusion does not concern President Trump nor his acts. Rather, it is essential to look up-close on the origin of “Collusion” and its main elementary reasoning derived from prior occurrence which predates this historical memory of documentation.

The main trigger of the hoax had been in effect a making of its own. This can be roughly dated to early 2015. By then, CIA had lost sight of its moral compass and was politically bankrupt due to the civil war in Syria. The growth of competitive ISIS had spurted above all in the terrorist activities. This had a power vacuum impact on the rest of Middle East. The intelligence agencies were turning blind eye, as they were in interests of isolating Syria from its ideological enemy (i.e., Russia). But some Americans were not impressed at all with Washington, D.C. They were not ready to let go of 9/11 memory. It never faded from their mind.

And Russia has provided that naked space of approval. ISIS, having looted gold stocks from Iraq for its own gain, managed to extend its presence at abysmal phase within a short period of time. Eventually it faced a formidable enemy: Russia from air space. For first time, Russia had unleashed its train of Tu-95 bombers all across the Middle East and since then had crippled ISIS Caliphate beyond recognition permanently.

In retrospect, CIA was not happy. Its influence in the Middle East was greatly hampered and diminished. They had no chance of winning back the American public opinion. Its behavior was eerily pre-9/11 thinking, thinking that terrorists were on their side. No doubt they were, which is a cause for hysteria in the aftermath.

And that was it. It created the fertile ground for Government to win the public opinion. That leeway naturally fell to FBI in its slow pace of investigation. Politics was tense and foreign policy was in a complete disarray. It was concluded that “allies” had to be won back through the domestic Government persecution. And that was precisely what Mueller did. Ultimately, the Federal Government believed that it held higher moral grounds than Americans, who were still traumatised by 9/11 only fourteen years earlier and most likely would disprove of Washington’s acts.

There is another agency that thinks the same: that American opinions don’t matter except their own. That agency is CIA.

There may or may not have been a collusion. But that collusion was within the public approval: destruction of ISIS at all costs. Americans did not want a repetition of mistakes of the past (i.e., 9/11). That was the main motive for large numbers of Americans to defect and call it in. Many Americans were already in supervision of FBI well from their inception and thus the trail led to there.

Like it or not, the process of “falling” was profound. That long process of aftermath became the TDS in origin, in which intelligence agencies sought to find a connection between Trump and Russia. All based on little evidence.

In this case, Russia won at opportunity in popular contest and was decisive in rolling back American foreign policy at the time. Washington would not budge to the last fight in Syria. The “collusion” hoax was a main drivel for distraction from what was happening in Damascus. The only collusion we had was the agreement between American public opinion at large and Russian action. Nobody deserved to rot in prison for the annihilation of murderous ISIS regime, a so-called “ally” of CIA that was spiraling out of control.