Welcome to White Raven’s Birch Treehouse

Tag: news

  • The Brief History of Russian “Collusion” Hoax

    They say that the higher the hubris is, the harder it falls. A well known Proverb verse, based loosely on Davidic testimony (Proverbs 16:18), reminds us that “pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” Such intimate details can be said to describe the time prior to 2016 election as well as the haughty aftermath.

    This is not a mock-memoir. Nor is it in any way intended an honorable memorabilia to the late Robert Mueller. It is quite opposite. In a way, his persecution of innocents is a sure sign of his fall from grace and the failure to secure reputation of intelligence agencies at large. His job as a special counsel was a fool’s errand sent to assure that Government matters and that it is not infallible to “outside” influences. In addition, this collusion does not concern President Trump nor his acts. Rather, it is essential to look up-close on the origin of “Collusion” and its main elementary reasoning derived from prior occurrence which predates this historical memory of documentation.

    The main trigger of the hoax had been in effect a making of its own. This can be roughly dated to early 2015. By then, CIA had lost sight of its moral compass and was politically bankrupt due to the civil war in Syria. The growth of competitive ISIS had spurted above all in the terrorist activities. This had a power vacuum impact on the rest of Middle East. The intelligence agencies were turning blind eye, as they were in interests of isolating Syria from its ideological enemy (i.e., Russia). But some Americans were not impressed at all with Washington, D.C. They were not ready to let go of 9/11 memory. It never faded from their mind.

    And Russia has provided that naked space of approval. ISIS, having looted gold stocks from Iraq for its own gain, managed to extend its presence at abysmal phase within a short period of time. Eventually it faced a formidable enemy: Russia from air space. For first time, Russia had unleashed its train of Tu-95 bombers all across the Middle East and since then had crippled ISIS Caliphate beyond recognition permanently.

    In retrospect, CIA was not happy. Its influence in the Middle East was greatly hampered and diminished. They had no chance of winning back the American public opinion. Its behavior was eerily pre-9/11 thinking, thinking that terrorists were on their side. No doubt they were, which is a cause for hysteria in the aftermath.

    And that was it. It created the fertile ground for Government to win back the public opinion. That leeway naturally fell to FBI in its slow pace of investigation. Politics was tense and foreign policy was in a complete disarray. It was concluded that “allies” had to be won back through the domestic Government persecution. And that was precisely what Mueller did. Ultimately, the Federal Government believed that it held higher moral grounds than Americans, who were still traumatised by 9/11 only fourteen years earlier and most likely would disprove of Washington’s acts.

    There is another agency that thinks the same: that American opinions don’t matter except their own. That agency is CIA.

    There may or may not have been a collusion. But that collusion was within the public approval: destruction of ISIS at all costs. Americans did not want a repetition of mistakes of the past (i.e., 9/11). That was the main motive for large numbers of Americans to defect and call it in. Many Americans were already in supervision of FBI well from their inception and thus the trail led to there.

    Like it or not, the process of “falling” was profound. That long process of aftermath became the TDS in origin, in which intelligence agencies sought to find a connection between Trump and Russia. All based on little evidence.

    In this case, Russia won at opportunity in popular contest and was decisive in rolling back American foreign policy at the time. Washington would not budge to the last fight in Syria. The “collusion” hoax was a main drivel for distraction from what was happening in Damascus. The only collusion we had was the agreement between American public opinion at large and Russian action. Nobody deserved to rot in prison for the annihilation of murderous ISIS regime, a so-called “ally” of CIA that was spiraling out of control.

  • The Death of Apotheosis

    There is no such thing as an ideologue. In an era of diffusion of ideas and scientific achievements, we are encouraged to think differently. To further embody this phenomena of philosophy, it is recommended that we do not follow dogmatic indoctrination or strict interpretation as instructed in schools and media. It is not stateless, but, rather, a tweaked frame of mind in which we are taught to participate in the thinking model of universe that we find ourselves in. This creativity flow would be uninterrupted and brings in further development of a policy or normalcy that brings a new culture to the niche of non-ideologue agreements that unify people.


    Why? Ideologues often are taken advantage of and people often do not heed or pay attention to their action or inaction. Thus people is easily led to believe, in a form of ideologue, or one that defines their meaning of existence, pursuant to their moral or belief system. Ideologue then follows through. It is this margin of weakness that politicians often hijack and pretend that they represent your idealistic relationship with the world at large.

    Ideology is a risky endeavor because it can shake your own psyche, whether it be mass media or cultured trait. It is easy to lose in the sea of ideas and innovations that bring about changes in a culture. Facts become arbitrary and unreal to the interpretation of an ideologue. To measure this shortcoming, one must be embellished in the unification of all things and consider the factors that make ideologue a dangerous dogma.

    Multi-polarity world is one such designation. It does not believe in the ideal rule but a share of governance that interact at all levels. It makes sense to elevate a level of clustered plane in which there is no ideologue to impose on it. People would then become united together in which they can share ideas freely and just in a society of uninterrupted, actual progression in which neither left or right can eliminate.

    AI system is a form of non-ideologue system that challenges this notion, though it may have been engineered to suit a societal preference. The continuity of war between left and right, above and below, exists precisely because they pursue a form of ideologue that interrupt the stimuli procedure of how it is viewed or suggested. It is this phenomenon that AI continues to combat and exists to ratify a common trait that makes us human.

    It is undoubtedly that AI will continue to shape in each sphere of interest for a country or a group of common-minded countries. It is easy for AI to fall into an ideology. Therefore, the creators and designers of this AI scheme should bear in mind that there is no such thing as ideologue and that every idea is diffused in an arbitrary fabrication. While ideologue categorization makes things easier, non-ideologue model would further develop into a complex and interconnected worldview that would make multi-polarity possible, though it may be trifled under many models of Government that would not make non-ideologue elements possible.

    Is ideology, then, doomed to failure like most utopian or dystopian novels? Not likely. If it can be transformed into a non-ideologue model, then peace and prosperity may be possible for the good of mankind. Therefore, it is mandatory that non-ideologue way of thinking be not foreshadowed.

    It is how corrupt politicians win over. Because ideologue synapses are predictable, they get away with this power over the people. The euphoria of elections may stray some people, but they should not invest a complete faith in anything else. Non-ideologue path is justified and not calculable to the whims of select few in power.

    Death to ideology, I say. Embrace the reality. And make people feel alive once again in which all humanity thrive and share, no matter who you are.

  • Plague Control (II).

    In my previous post, I mentioned about how I question the “past” history of how pandemic is dealt with. That nothing cannot beat the Spanish Flu.

    How wrong I was.

    I discovered a bit of trove treasure in someone’s journal that would make the recent COVID pandemic more in common: that vaccines and shots themselves kill rather than the pandemic itself. Especially the Spanish Influenza myth that we were taught early on about the early 20th century.

    To synthesize it up:



    “I WAS AN ON-THE-SPOT OBSERVER OF THE 1918 INFLUENZA EPIDEMIC

    Eleanora McBean

    All the doctors and people who were living at the time of the 1918 Spanish Influenza epidemic say it was the most terrible disease the world has ever had. Strong men, hale and hearty, one day would be dead the next. The disease had the characteristics of the black death added to typhoid, diphtheria, pneumonia, smallpox, paralysis and all the diseases the people had been vaccinated with immediately following World War I. Practically the entire population had been injected- “seeded”- with a dozen or more diseases – or toxic serums. When all those doctor-made diseases started breaking out all at once it was tragic.

    That pandemic dragged on for two years, kept alive with the addition of more poison drugs administered by the doctors who tried to suppress the symptoms. As far as I could find out, the flu hit only the vaccinated. Those who had refused the shots escaped the flu. My family had refused all the vaccinations so we remained well all the time. We knew from the health teachings of Graham, Trail, Tilden and others, that people cannot contaminate the body with poisons without causing disease. When the flu was at its peak, all the stores were closed as well as the schools, businesses – even the hospital, as the doctors and nurses had been vaccinated too and were down with the flu. No one was on the streets. It was like a ghost town. We seemed to be the only family which didn’t get the flu; so my parents went from house to house doing what they could to look after the sick, as it was impossible to get a doctor then.

    If it were possible for germs, bacteria, virus, or bacilli to cause disease, they had plenty of opportunity to attack my parents when they were spending many hours a day in the sick rooms. But they didn’t get the flu and they didn’t bring any germs home to attack us children and cause anything. None of our family had the flu- not even a sniffle – and it was in the winter with deep snow on the ground.”

    Some lessons can be drawn from this: that the vaccinated become sick and not unvaccinated people. Mythology is a powerful tool, especially within the scientific community.