They say that the higher the hubris is, the harder it falls. A well known Proverb verse, based loosely on Davidic testimony (Proverbs 16:18), reminds us that “pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” Such intimate details can be said to describe the time prior to 2016 election as well as the haughty aftermath.
This is not a mock-memoir. Nor is it in any way intended an honorable memorabilia to the late Robert Mueller. It is quite opposite. In a way, his persecution of innocents is a sure sign of his fall from grace and the failure to secure reputation of intelligence agencies at large. His job as a special counsel was a fool’s errand sent to assure that Government matters and that it is not infallible to “outside” influences. In addition, this collusion does not concern President Trump nor his acts. Rather, it is essential to look up-close on the origin of “Collusion” and its main elementary reasoning derived from prior occurrence which predates this historical memory of documentation.
The main trigger of the hoax had been in effect a making of its own. This can be roughly dated to early 2015. By then, CIA had lost sight of its moral compass and was politically bankrupt due to the civil war in Syria. The growth of competitive ISIS had spurted above all in the terrorist activities. This had a power vacuum impact on the rest of Middle East. The intelligence agencies were turning blind eye, as they were in interests of isolating Syria from its ideological enemy (i.e., Russia). But some Americans were not impressed at all with Washington, D.C. They were not ready to let go of 9/11 memory. It never faded from their mind.
And Russia has provided that naked space of approval. ISIS, having looted gold stocks from Iraq for its own gain, managed to extend its presence at abysmal phase within a short period of time. Eventually it faced a formidable enemy: Russia from air space. For first time, Russia had unleashed its train of Tu-95 bombers all across the Middle East and since then had crippled ISIS Caliphate beyond recognition permanently.
In retrospect, CIA was not happy. Its influence in the Middle East was greatly hampered and diminished. They had no chance of winning back the American public opinion. Its behavior was eerily pre-9/11 thinking, thinking that terrorists were on their side. No doubt they were, which is a cause for hysteria in the aftermath.
And that was it. It created the fertile ground for Government to win back the public opinion. That leeway naturally fell to FBI in its slow pace of investigation. Politics was tense and foreign policy was in a complete disarray. It was concluded that “allies” had to be won back through the domestic Government persecution. And that was precisely what Mueller did. Ultimately, the Federal Government believed that it held higher moral grounds than Americans, who were still traumatised by 9/11 only fourteen years earlier and most likely would disprove of Washington’s acts.
There is another agency that thinks the same: that American opinions don’t matter except their own. That agency is CIA.
There may or may not have been a collusion. But that collusion was within the public approval: destruction of ISIS at all costs. Americans did not want a repetition of mistakes of the past (i.e., 9/11). That was the main motive for large numbers of Americans to defect and call it in. Many Americans were already in supervision of FBI well from their inception and thus the trail led to there.
Like it or not, the process of “falling” was profound. That long process of aftermath became the TDS in origin, in which intelligence agencies sought to find a connection between Trump and Russia. All based on little evidence.
In this case, Russia won at opportunity in popular contest and was decisive in rolling back American foreign policy at the time. Washington would not budge to the last fight in Syria. The “collusion” hoax was a main drivel for distraction from what was happening in Damascus. The only collusion we had was the agreement between American public opinion at large and Russian action. Nobody deserved to rot in prison for the annihilation of murderous ISIS regime, a so-called “ally” of CIA that was spiraling out of control.
Tag: politics
-
The Brief History of Russian “Collusion” Hoax
-
The Death of Apotheosis II
In my prototypical preface of the Death of Apotheosis article, I suggested the idea of non-ideologue model, or pragmatism, that may exalt and better sought after than an ideology model would. Because it would shape an ideology in a menace light to contrast under this diffused model, it is not inevitable that there would be barriers drawn up by both models. So often consequences of an ideology are felt across and therefore the terror-and-trial synthesis shared in the non-ideologue path are less impactful.
I am not advocating for the complete rejection of ideology and replace it with non-ideologue system because that would enable the rise of primitive culture that has not yet grown or diffused, making it a sluggish endeavor at inception. You cannot criticize the ideology system if it does not exist. Rather, it is my view that there always have been at least one residual element of non-ideologue system that have fought back, adjusted to, or assimilated into ideology model.
In my private criticism towards the said ideology as a whole feature, it is necessary to outline their traits and attributes that define their parameters of the system. They may cover the subjects of politics, religion, and even ethnos. One of obvious archetypes of this model is zealotry, one that does not cease relentlessly. Other characteristic feature often overlooked is the fact that the ideological model is always in a permanent struggle against itself and the world at large. Betterment is therefore the defining feature of this struggle in the name of “ideology”.
Less obvious trait is the consolidated ethos that sustain throughout the system, though it may have been riddled with pathos. Therefore, under ideal condition of non-ideologue model, emotions and intuitive premonitions are less encouraged and not subject to mass indoctrination. Rational impulses become the norm if ideology is to be defeated and outdone by the notion of non-attached ideas or concepts that may be minimal at emotional level or stimuli interruption.
Because of the silent attacks on ideology model, it underwent a change in its phase. That phase is ideological subversion. Because it has to sustain its position on a society of its own standing, it became more political as well as more fervent in its religious zealotry and exported ethos from the seed of ethnos. It eliminates the elements of non-ideologue philosophy as a way to reach en masse. It may even issue an outright ban, which, ironically, often draw in more of the non-ideologue antagonism. The less obvious characteristic of ideological subversion is an overt fallback to the inner circle of archetypal non-ideologue model of its own making that enable the fusion of ideology back into the crowd. These may be mediums, justifications, or arguments among this circle. In effect, the marriage of secret non-ideologue groups and ideologue become the subversive effort to offshoot all the other existing non-ideologue groups into existential battle for beliefs and systematized anti-ideological ranking.
This phenomenal paragon has been largely recorded in much of the 20th century from its primitive baby-step inception in the previous century. That system was the Marxist yoke across Eurasia. The imposition of class struggle created a major rapture from the rule of Christian ethos. Ironically, it is the Christian concept of inclusive acceptance and gradual epitome of moral justification that has made Marxism possible. This sad depart from the depression of Capitalist-Nationalist fervor resulted in the millions of deaths. The struggle of communist non-ideologue groups from within has became an ideology itself. The power transformed Russia from Tsardom to the Soviet empire in transition formulated by Leninist platform.
This new phantom had outlawed, purged, exiled, and banned virtually all the non-ideologue stereotypes in an alignment to Marxist ideology. Scientific progress and society were halted and decelerated at all levels that resulted in pressures and projections of non-ideologue groups to undergo an atheism phase. The disillusionment and unhappiness with the new system were complete. Ideological subversion became the law of land. Scientists, in private, continue to practice the non-ideologue status apart from the Soviet mentality, though purged by the changes in Soviet structures and Stalinist initiatives. The rapprochement of new Stalinist policy in the struggle for Soviet ideology had imprisoned the minds of much non-ideologue archetypes everywhere after the expulsion of Bolsheviks out of the picture. The era of pseudo-scientific circles such as Lamarckism and Lysenkoism had found their way into the Communist dogma, in which they were seen as “compatible” with Marxist ideology resulting in the definitive choking points of scientific progress. The rest of non-ideologue classes were then forced to be subservient to the Communist state in state-sponsored science labs at prison camps and chained strata of gulag system, in effect creating the intoxication of non-ideologue rupture as an end-goal that was gradual and slow in coming decades. The beginning of the rupture occurred only after Stalin’s death, though Soviet mentality was reinforced everywhere thereafter.
Meanwhile, in America, a backlash was made against the Hollywood Marxism for which it continue to extol and export its leftist elements. The capitalism of mass media became ideological subversion, challenging the old and traditional way of life with new ideas, fashions, and uncultured concepts that had yet to materialize. Early indoctrination and education became the center of entertainment of Hollywood elites in its lucrative practices. The cinematic euphoria morphed into a more covert effort in tune with the elites of the Left and accomplish the agenda of Californication of the US.
Of course, non-ideologue elements were already underway, though difficult to do so under the cinematic symbolism, creating the cults and in alignment with dominance of American ethnos in 1980s. This new revival campaign of non-ideologue art accelerated the process of American ideology from within, one that strives to perfection through the practical and imperfect practices of the said groups. In the American empire, an affinity alliance with non-ideologue archetype became visible across the cinema rather than the ideological leftovers of the Golden Era of Hollywood in forties and fifties. The conquest of independent non-ideologue system was complete in that it became a semi-ideology pursuit for which it defines what it means to be an American.
Does this mean that the relationship cannot exist without ideology in place? Absolutely, the non-ideologue model needed an ideology to exist. There is no other purpose. The continuation of non-ideologue freedom is constant in perpetuity importing and exporting of the ideological state back and forth, as though it is in an eternal experimentation. This continual rupture, made to fruition through the scientific and technological progress, brought in Darpanet and the eventual publication of early Internet that would doom any ideological hopes or advances by the ruling elite and Government. But the current model cannot exist without any ideology in any form.
This analytic community therefore approaches the problems of Democracy and Republic. Democracy, in its ideal formation, continues to claim perfection through imperfect means, while Republic exists as a continuation of non-ideologue state. Thus, the problem of non-ideology system was that it simply enables the rise of “perfect” ideology in reaction. The platonic equilibrium of ideology is then assumed as a contender to the non-ideologue patterns of Internet in its so-called ideological “Democratic” platform that has done less to combat all kinds of ideological subversion, in effect creating the division of all-inclusive Left and scattered anti-ideological model of the Republic right.
Perhaps some lessons can be drawn from the 19th century. If not for Christian ethos model, non-ideologue system would not have come in existence. The Capitalist struggles and the marriage of Christian ethos model and non-ideologue groups that continue to create diffusion of ideas and personas from within created the new modern phenomena of marginalized class born from Karl Marx’s Das Kapital. The Jewish identity and their perceived endorsement of non-ideologue Marxist mindset arose under the all-inclusive ethos of civilized Christian nations in early 20th century. And the secularism of non-ideologue groups have made that possible.
When seen in the same lens of 21st century, amid the American isolationism, is non-ideologue system under threat from all-powerful Government? Would a marginalized group from the Balkanization of a nation that threat to encompass? Will the ideology of Islam overcome, as Bolsheviks had in Russia? Surely, the ideology of Democracy would exacerbate and attempt to crush the Republican form of non-ideologue groups. There is a name for that, “tyranny of the majority.” It is called anti-Americanism.
Death to ideology, I say. Again. Embrace the reality. Again. You can make all the difference in world if you have a portion of faith in non-ideologue system. Democracy is the tyranny of people. Thomas Jefferson would have liked alongside you fighting against the “elective despotism.”
Death to ideology. -
The Death of Apotheosis
There is no such thing as an ideologue. In an era of diffusion of ideas and scientific achievements, we are encouraged to think differently. To further embody this phenomena of philosophy, it is recommended that we do not follow dogmatic indoctrination or strict interpretation as instructed in schools and media. It is not stateless, but, rather, a tweaked frame of mind in which we are taught to participate in the thinking model of universe that we find ourselves in. This creativity flow would be uninterrupted and brings in further development of a policy or normalcy that brings a new culture to the niche of non-ideologue agreements that unify people.
Why? Ideologues often are taken advantage of and people often do not heed or pay attention to their action or inaction. Thus people is easily led to believe, in a form of ideologue, or one that defines their meaning of existence, pursuant to their moral or belief system. Ideologue then follows through. It is this margin of weakness that politicians often hijack and pretend that they represent your idealistic relationship with the world at large.
Ideology is a risky endeavor because it can shake your own psyche, whether it be mass media or cultured trait. It is easy to lose in the sea of ideas and innovations that bring about changes in a culture. Facts become arbitrary and unreal to the interpretation of an ideologue. To measure this shortcoming, one must be embellished in the unification of all things and consider the factors that make ideologue a dangerous dogma.
Multi-polarity world is one such designation. It does not believe in the ideal rule but a share of governance that interact at all levels. It makes sense to elevate a level of clustered plane in which there is no ideologue to impose on it. People would then become united together in which they can share ideas freely and just in a society of uninterrupted, actual progression in which neither left or right can eliminate.
AI system is a form of non-ideologue system that challenges this notion, though it may have been engineered to suit a societal preference. The continuity of war between left and right, above and below, exists precisely because they pursue a form of ideologue that interrupt the stimuli procedure of how it is viewed or suggested. It is this phenomenon that AI continues to combat and exists to ratify a common trait that makes us human.
It is undoubtedly that AI will continue to shape in each sphere of interest for a country or a group of common-minded countries. It is easy for AI to fall into an ideology. Therefore, the creators and designers of this AI scheme should bear in mind that there is no such thing as ideologue and that every idea is diffused in an arbitrary fabrication. While ideologue categorization makes things easier, non-ideologue model would further develop into a complex and interconnected worldview that would make multi-polarity possible, though it may be trifled under many models of Government that would not make non-ideologue elements possible.
Is ideology, then, doomed to failure like most utopian or dystopian novels? Not likely. If it can be transformed into a non-ideologue model, then peace and prosperity may be possible for the good of mankind. Therefore, it is mandatory that non-ideologue way of thinking be not foreshadowed.
It is how corrupt politicians win over. Because ideologue synapses are predictable, they get away with this power over the people. The euphoria of elections may stray some people, but they should not invest a complete faith in anything else. Non-ideologue path is justified and not calculable to the whims of select few in power.
Death to ideology, I say. Embrace the reality. And make people feel alive once again in which all humanity thrive and share, no matter who you are.
Welcome to White Raven’s Birch Treehouse 